Attorney AI Sanctions Tracker
The most comprehensive public database of U.S. and international cases where attorneys, pro se litigants, and judges have faced consequences for AI hallucinations and misuse in legal practice. Over 1,981 documented cases from court records, bar orders, and published disciplinary actions.
1,981
Cases documented
Global
USA, Canada, UK, AU & more
Rule 3.3
Most frequently implicated rule
Weekly
Update cadence
Why This List Exists
The hallucinations are real. The exposure is growing.
Attorneys, pro se litigants, and even judges across the United States and internationally are submitting AI-generated content to courts without independent verification. The results range from fabricated citations to invented statutes — and courts and disciplinary authorities are responding with sanctions, reprimands, fines, bar referrals, and in some cases disqualification.
KeaneAdvisors.AI maintains this tracker because the profession needs a clear, factual record of what is actually happening. The database is assembled from public court records, bar disciplinary orders, and published judicial opinions worldwide. It is not speculation. These are documented cases.
Source data is maintained by Telcloud LLC dba KeaneAdvisors.AI from multiple sources which are updated regularly. We gratefully acknowledge and thank Damien Charlotin's for producing the AI Hallucination Cases database which is a primary source.
Access Required
Search 1,981 documented AI hallucination cases
Documented Cases by Month
From isolated incidents to an epidemic
1,981
current total
171
Mar 2026 alone
Monthly series through June 8, 2026 · 1,981 total cases currently documented
Access the Database
Enter your details to view all 1,981 cases
No password or account needed. Just your name and email.